14 Ağustos 2012 Salı

IOA Representative Keynotes Conference of Brazilian Ombuds

To contact us Click HERE
The International Ombudsman Association was invited by the Association of Brazilian Ouvidores/Ombudsmen to participate in its Fifteenth Annual Congress which was held in the city of Vila Velha, in the state of Espiritu Santo on August, 6-8 2012. José Martínez-Aragón delivered the keynote speech on behalf of IOA in which he gave an overview of the role of both Organizational Ombuds and the IOA.

As part of the address, Martínez-Aragón opened up a discussion among participants on possible means of cooperation between Ombuds and Ouvidores.  As one of the IOA aims is to create strategic alliances with other key organizations and professionals involved in the field of dispute resolution, a number of possible initiatives to work together with the ABO were discussed, including training courses; publications; conferences and seminars; events to promote the use of ombudsmen in the Latin American region; mentoring experiences; and certification program. Martínez-Aragón is the United Nations Regional Ombudsman stationed in Santiago, Chile. (ABO Congress Program.)
Related post:  FCO President to Speak at [2010] Brazilian Ombuds Conference.

Attendings who don't want to teach

To contact us Click HERE

Q: Now that I'm *officially* well into my intern year, I realize that some of our EM attendings are not interested in teaching (or otherwise interacting) with interns. As an intern, I'm offended. Is this acceptable behavior, and how should I handle it?


A: You're right, the attendings should be willing to work with ALL of their OWN residents (interns included). Its one thing to shun rotating residents/intern/students, but *your own* should be taken care of.

There are two different ways to look at this to help explain why SOME (i.e. not me, LOL) attendings avoid students/interns. The first way is to try and see their point of view.

Imagine you’re an attending:

When you go to work, you feel exposed (legally) because the residents are a liability. They don’t always know what to look for, what to tell you about, and how to treat the problem. Even if you, yourself, get up and go see/talk to the patient, you may miss something in your short interaction. And there are LOTS of patients. Actually, you feel overwhelmed at times because you’re responsible for the actions of others, although you don’t know what they’re doing/hearing/seeing. You have to ‘trust’ them…and that’s hard to do. And, you are just one person, and to have 2-4 people ‘presenting’ cases to you for 8-12 hours is just too hard. You can’t think, you don’t know who’s sick…and you can’t physically see everyone and do everything yourself.

And it’s even *worse* when an intern is working. BECAUSE they *really* don’t know what to look for, ask about, check or test for. And when they present to you, the story is often unclear, and you’re left sorta confused. The differential is too broad when the intern presents, and you either have to go see the patient yourself, or ask lots of detailed questions to the intern to get a better story. If the intern didn’t ask the important questions, you either have to send them back to get a better history and physical, OR you order tons of tests/studies to compensate.

Example:

10 month old baby is brought in my mom with a fever to 102.9 x 1 week. Intern presents it as a viral syndrome. Great, discharge, right? BUT they didn’t notice the dehydration and lethargy. They didn’t comment on the petechial rash. So, as an attending you can either:

1) get up and see the patient yourself as if he’s your own (this isn’t very practical if you have more than a couple of residents/interns to supervise or else the flow of the department will be very slow)

2) have the intern order more tests and studies to support the ultimate dispo (which isn’t really teaching, and isn’t really proper EM)

3) you can have a senior resident see the patient, and ‘advise’ the intern. That way, the likelihood of missing meningitis is lower if the senior resident signed off on the intern’s work.

Of the 3 – it’s easier to have the senior resident involved. Also, it’s logical because it allows the senior resident to see more, do more, supervise a bit, and begin managing an entire department. And as attending, you’re there just as back-up for the senior resident. It’s easier to teach the intern if the obvious nuances of the case have been discussed with the senior (at least from July – December). And it frees the attending up to work with the senior and students as well.

The attendings look forward to working with certain residents, just as much as residents like particular attendings. Typically attendings like residents who are confident, do appropriate work-ups, then come to them with their own thoughts about what’s going on, and what to do about it. Then the attending can talk to the resident as an educational ‘coach’ and (almost) colleague about the case. This is fun for attending.

Being stressed out about missing something because an unreliable resident (whether it’s because they’re ‘new’ or just ‘suck’) is telling you half-truths and cannot think for themselves…is miserable.

***

The second way to try and understand what’s going on is to realize that this has nothing to do with you, and everything to do with their own issues:

Imagine you’re an attending…and you’re a bit bitter about your job (for whatever reason). Really, you don’t want to work shifts, you’d rather get credit for shifts worked, while NOT doing any shifts. BUT, you’re not quite *important* enough for the department to allow you to engage in other scholarly activities…and since they NEED attendings to work shifts, you get more than your “fair share” (for your rank and experience), in your opinion. But you can’t quit, because you need your benefits and paycheck too bad. So you make due.

There are two types of doctors (those who actually are comfortable with themselves, their knowledge, and love to share and can readily admit when they are unsure of something....and there are those who pretend to know *everything* and don't want to answer questions because they feel threatened by the resident who's actively reading, and who, on any given day, may be better-read on a particular topic than the attending).

So let's say I'm the second type of attending -

I don't want to 'expose' myself as interns don't know much about 'the way things work' and instead of just 'going with it' they'll ask:

"why? why? why do we use this drug instead of that drug? why can't we just do the procedure this way like Rivers said? Tintinali's new edition said that we shouldn't use this study, that the new ultrasound technique is better..."

Whereas a senior would be more apt to 'just go with it' as per current local ED culture. And if the senior asks questions, it's more appropriate for the attending to follow-up their question with a 'reading assignment' to be presented the next shift. So the residents ‘learn’ to not ask questions.


So, in short: either this is their way of hiding the fact that they don’t know something….OR they’re acting out because they don’t want to be in the position they’re in….

Either way nothing to do with you.


My advice is: YOU SAY NOTHING! Go with the flow...and do not let the Eye of Sauron fall upon you. Stay below the radar right now. Learn, learn, learn. Shine on the inservice in February.

Next year...maybe say something if you're still so inclined (maybe). It's not worth the risk right now. If you're black-listed, you will have a horrible residency experience. Lots of former residents can attest to this fact.

Medical Memoir - In Stitches One Girl's Opinion

To contact us Click HERE

Medical school memories came *flooding* back as I read Anthony Youn’s memoir, In Stitches.

Medical school was a time in my life where the details are sketchy because it was a blur of studying, isolation, anxiety, frustration…sprinkled with intermittent moments of fascination and joy. I can completely relate to his thoughts about pediatrics, “Little people, little dollah”, and being torn between life-style specialties and being a “real” doctor. I shared his dislike for the standardized patients and the weirdness that entire situation evokes in all of us.

My favorite aspect about this book is its honesty and authenticity. As I devoured the book chapter by chapter, I felt like I UNDERSTOOD Tony. I was able to peek into a life very similar, but very different from my own. His book was truthful, the language was clear, the humor and candidness kept me interested and I really felt like I traveled this journey with Tony. As I read the pages, I thought of my OWN similar experiences….and my reaction to them. And as I flipped the page….reading his words were like reading my own mind. It was quite amazing!

There were only two questions that stayed with me through-out the book: Why didn’t his family help him acquire better living conditions? And was he really a virgin until medical school? (implied, but not stated)

I will say that I feel like the first part of the book would appeal more to young men, with all the talk about girls, women, and overall “manning up.” Since women do not (typically) go through this, it’s all very foreign in an annoying kind of way (as a woman). I was much more interested in…all the rest. Thankfully there’s plenty of ‘all the rest’ and the book was thoroughly enjoyable.

I would LOVE to read a “part II” plastic surgery residency memoir. It really was *that* good!


University of California, Davis - Asst./Associate Librarian (Library Field Trainer)

To contact us Click HERE
http://www.norcalherc.org/c/job.cfm?site_id=730&jb=10676857

The Library Field Trainer is responsible for developing an outreach and implementation plan for the dissemination of eHealth information and resources on consumer health promotion and wellness for library staff primarily in rural locations. In this role, the incumbent develops an action plan for implementing on-site eHealth training for library staff, and reports on progress relating to these activities. This includes analyzing existing eHealth training resources and tailoring those resources to meet the specific training and educational needs of rural and urban library staff; providing on-site trainings and assistance to library staff, primarily in rural areas, to increase library staff knowledge and ability to provide reliable internet-based information and resources on consumer health promotion and wellness; exhibiting and demonstrating health information resources as appropriate to improve access to eHealth resources; and collaborating with regional rural libraries to improve consumer access and understanding of eHealth information resources. The incumbent works with the Principal Investigator and BTOP management team and assists with regional outreach as needed. Must be able to work extra hours (nights and weekends) on occasion if important development is behind schedule or the correction of problems considered critical. A valid California Driver?s License and ability to travel throughout the state and spend significant time in the field is required. Required Qualifications:
? Two years experience as a Medical Librarian, Health Reference Librarian or related field.
? Extensive experience developing and conducting trainings for library staff.
? Ability to work with local library staff to identify specific health information needs of the community
? Familiarity with issues faced by rural public libraries
? Ability to work cooperatively and collegially within a diverse environment.
? Ability to integrate the understanding of UCD/UCDHS?s mission, commitments and projects within a service-oriented health care environment.
? Interpersonal and leadership abilities to quickly ascertain group dynamics and organizational issues and respond appropriately and effectively
? Excellent oral and written communication skills required to prepare and conduct trainings and presentations and to communicate effectively with library staff

Lincoln - High School Library Technician

To contact us Click HERE
http://www.edjoin.org/viewPosting.aspx?postingID=441122&countyID=31&onlineApp=1&utm_source=Indeed&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=Indeed  Four year college degree, preferably in education, English/Language Arts, Library Science or other college/career related field. Two years of increasingly responsible experience in a library or audio-visual center preferred.

All applicants must apply through www.edjoin.org

An incomplete or unsigned application will not be considered.

Attachments must be scanned and attached to the Ed-join application.

Having trouble or need assistance with your application? Please go to www.edjoin.org and click on “Help Center” for information regarding how to attach documents to your application, or how to update your profile. You may also contact the Ed-join help desk by calling 888-900-8945 or by emailing edjoin_helpdesk@sbcss.k12.ca.us

For additional information, call Kari O'Toole in the Personnel Department at 916-645-5293.



DocumentsOne requirement from each bulleted group MUST be met before your application will be considered.



  • Letter of Introduction

  • Letter(s) of Recommendation (3 Letters Required)

  • Resume